Printer Friendly Version
Email this thread to a friend
|
Featured Web Site Template |
|
Reflects user activity within the last 5 minutes
|
|
| Member |
Message |
pk2000
Joined: Eons Ago
# Posts: 41
|
Posted: 2004-Jul-13 21:37
Hmmm... it tells me that:
Body Tag:
There are 814 words in the body.
There are no keywords in the body.
but i have 410 words and 13 kewords in body.
A HREF Tag Link Text:
There are 170 word(s) in the href tags.
Frequency in the HREF tags = 9
Weighted Keyword Density in the HREF tag= 10.59%
keyword 6 times in href
interesting...
|
 |
andromeda
Joined: Jan 28, 2004
# Posts: 38
|
Posted: 2004-Jul-16 19:58
I know this topic is a few days old... but I thought I would mention:
I tried this tool recently, and it seems to combine much of the reporting elements but also provides a percentage score by which to guage your efforts.
(url points to web-inspectdotcom)
Have you used this tool on the top sites for keywords? I ran it on the top sites for the keywords in Google I'm targeting - and it gave the top sites that have been on the top of Google for over a year a mark like 8/100 or at the most, 12/100. Not sure if anyone should adjust their site to be as close to 100 as possible, with results like that.
Just a thought.
|
|
mukul
Joined: Oct 12, 2003
# Posts: 241
|
Posted: 2004-Jul-17 10:04
Well said andromedia, I was just beginning to take that tol seriously as it rated my test page 8 and so I thought that well, I might be wrong here. I guess using this tool on the best ranking sites will be great method to test its viabiity.
|
|
paulhiles
Joined: May 18, 2004
# Posts: 16
|
Posted: 2004-Jul-17 14:10
I think the tool is aimed squarely at those not overly familiar with SEO techniques. If you notice, the tool is actually called the "Search Engine Preparation Tool", and its intention seems to be to guage how well a new site is optimised before it is submitted to search engines.
Testing it on established well-ranked sites makes little sense IMO. Try looking at the backlinks to some of those sites.. that's what will give them their commanding position - not their onpage content.
I have no affiliation with the author of the tool, and I don't mind admitting there are a few niggly things I don't like about it... but it's still a useful alternative for a quick check on your pages.
|
|
You are not permitted to post messages in this forum or topic, because of one or more of the following reasons:
- You have not yet logged in, or registered properly as a member
- You are a member, but no longer have posting rights.
- This is a private forum, for which you do not have permissions.
If you are a recent member, it's possible that you simply have not yet confirmed your account. Please
check your email for a message entitled 'JimWorld Forums: Confirm Your Account' and follow the instructions
contained within.
If you cannot find this message, click here to Re-Send it.
|
If you are still experiencing problem, please read the
Login Assistance
Article for some advice on what may be causing your login not to work properly.
|
Switch to Advanced Editor and ...
Create a New Topic
or Reply to this Thread
|
|
Inbox
