More Virtual Promote ... Gazette · Webmaster & SEO Tools · Scumware.com · Free Website Templates

SEF

Search Engine Forums

Helping to make the Web - Since 1998

Virtual Promote Member Spotlight

Advertise With Us!

Free \$5.00 trial to start your account. (Findit-Quick)

.
Forums	Index	Active Topics	New Topics	My Topics	Search	My Profile	Register	Inbox	Rules & TOS
.

Forum Index · Search Engine Forums · Building, Hosting & Maintaining Your Website · Graphic Design - Basic HTML, CSS & Usability · Website design parameters.

Add to hotlist

Mark This Forum Read

Printer Friendly Version

Email this thread to a friend

Moderator(s): g1smd

Previous Topic Next Topic

Member	Message
Hampstead Joined: Feb 20, 2001 # Posts: 1978	Posted: 11/02/2007 05:19 am What is the current thinking on design with regards to screen resolution. Is it still most common to design to 800x600? or has 1024x?? taken over? (Copy Shortcut)

mj1256 Joined: Jun 05, 2006 # Posts: 783	Posted: 11/02/2007 11:20 am I go for 1024 by 768 the 800 x 600 guys can deal with the scroll bars. it does appear to be the middle ground. pre made templates seem to come with options such as 'narrow': 800x600; 'wide': 1024x768; 'auto': fluid width It also depands on the graphics as they can't stretch which creates some layout weirdness on the 1800+ resolutions. I recently found this article, er...ah... blog at the dzone which was informative. css-tricks.com/the-perfect-fluid-width-layout/ (Copy Shortcut)

g1smd Moderator Joined: Jul 28, 2002 # Posts: 10153 Website	Posted: 11/02/2007 12:21 pm My latest site is fully liquid and looks equally good at any resolution anywhere from 800x600 to 2000x1500. Only the smallest 640x480 resolution looks bad, and that is because there is a scroll bar in both directions. (Copy Shortcut)

mj1256 Joined: Jun 05, 2006 # Posts: 783	Posted: 11/02/2007 07:18 pm i'm doing about 50/50 fully liquid, it depends on the type of site, blog sites in my opinion don't need to be fully liquid fully fliud width is great for sites with tons and tons of content because it fits in without looking cluttered so maybe another question to consider is what types of sites are best fixed or fluid width? (Copy Shortcut)

Curt Joined: Eons Ago # Posts: 3677	Posted: 11/05/2007 02:30 am Fixed width allows for more control on site layout. With fluid sites, paragraphs can get real wide on big screens if the person has their browser full width. When paragraphs spread across the screen real wide, they get hard to follow with the eyes. Narrow pages of text are easier to read. I still design with 800 pixel widths in mind. Think it's a good idea to do that unless you have some special reason for making the pages wider. Many/most sites shouldn't be real wide. (Copy Shortcut)

mj1256 Joined: Jun 05, 2006 # Posts: 783	Posted: 11/05/2007 09:04 am i agree (Copy Shortcut)

excell Moderator Joined: Mar 19, 2001 # Posts: 14502 Website	Posted: 11/06/2007 08:23 am Well now, I can add to this The thing is - we should not be designing for screen resolution at all. As screens get bigger the browser size used by the viewer is what we need to consider. The actual browser size used is much smaller than what you imagine when you think in terms of screen resolution. As things speed up and become more efficient the power user is actually multi-tasking with multiple browsers/windows open on their screen...it is becoming more rare for people to actually open a browser to full screen view. Therefore, think carefully about the design in terms of usability when designing for fluid - does it compact & expand gracefully? For fixed - a good standard is still for 800 (set at around 760) which will enable at least two side by side instances on the screen of the bigger screen users. (Copy Shortcut)

Hampstead Joined: Feb 20, 2001 # Posts: 1978	Posted: 11/06/2007 01:25 pm I agree - I use 2 x 1680x1050 monitors. I normally have my browser window about 8-900 wide and almost the full height of the screen. If I visit one of those really annoying sites that re-size the browser to full screen, I visit the BBC site and use it to re-size the browser. They are still using the 800 wide format I think. Whatever it is, it suits me. I think I'll stick with the 800 format when specifying new websites for the time being. Thanks everybody for the input. (Copy Shortcut)

Forum Index · Search Engine Forums · Building, Hosting & Maintaining Your Website · Graphic Design - Basic HTML, CSS & Usability · Website design parameters.

Who's Online?

Reflects user activity within the last 5 minutes

Previous Topic Next Topic

You are not permitted to post messages in this forum or topic, because of one or more of the following reasons:

You have not yet logged in, or registered properly as a member
You are a member, but no longer have posting rights.
This is a private forum, for which you do not have permissions.

If you are a recent member, it's possible that you simply have not yet confirmed your account. Please check your email for a message entitled 'JimWorld Forums: Confirm Your Account' and follow the instructions contained within.

If you cannot find this message, click here to Re-Send it.

If you are still experiencing problem, please read the Login Assistance Article for some advice on what may be causing your login not to work properly.

Switch to Advanced Editor and ... Create a New Topic or Reply to this Thread

Related Forum Topics

Selling my website ZippyGames.co.uk (In: I Want to Sell My Website)
Website for sale $1300 per month (In: I Want to Sell My Website)
How Does Joomla Website Designing Work? (In: Graphic Design - Basic HTML, CSS & Usability)
Google not current with my website, MS Yahoo do (In: Google)
Interesting website position facts (In: Google)